I'm Clinging to My Faith And My Guns |
In every heart there is, of course, corruption. No one is immune from lust and greed.
Democracy accommodates this need, Embracing what might else lead to destruction.
People cannot people an ideal. Equality's a myth, always has been; No more than something to put favors in, Dependent on the lie that it is real.
Democracy accommodates this need, Embracing what might else lead to destruction.
People cannot people an ideal. Equality's a myth, always has been; No more than something to put favors in, Dependent on the lie that it is real.
Each decision is a battlefield, Not of ideas but of interests, yours and mine,
Calculated shrewdly to define. Exactly what advantage each might yield?
Do not be discouraged: Evil is As much a part of us as love or bliss.
Yet what is not a wound cannot be healed.
The United States has
just had our elections, and nothing has changed. Barack Obama remains president. The
Democrats remain in control of the Senate with a non-filibuster-proof majority.
The Republicans remain in control of the House of Representatives.
The national political dynamic has resulted in
an extended immobilization of the government. With the House -- a body where
party discipline is the norm -- under Republican control, passing legislation will
be difficult and require compromise. Since the Senate is in Democratic hands,
the probability of it overriding any unilateral administrative actions is
small. Nevertheless, Obama does not have enough congressional support for
dramatic new initiatives, and getting appointments through the Senate that
Republicans oppose will be difficult.
There is a quote often attributed to Thomas
Jefferson: "That government is best when it governs the least because its
people discipline themselves." I am not sure that the current political
climate is what was meant by the people disciplining themselves, but it is
clear that the people want to imposed profound limits on this government. Its
ability to continue what is already being done has not been curbed, but its
ability to do much that is new has been blocked.
American politics, like politics everywhere, is a
passionate business. The vilification from all sides that follows any mention I
make of American politics is both inevitable and unpleasant. Nevertheless, it's
my job to chronicle the unfoldings of our political system, and the fact that
the United States is now moving away from an election cycle will affect
American international behavior and therefore the international system.
Sheer size of our economic debt |
The United States remains the center of gravity of the
international system. The sheer size of our economy (regardless of our growth rate) and the power of our military (regardless of our current problems) is what makes us unique. Even more important, no single
leader of the world is as significant, for good or bad, as the American
president. That makes the American presidency, in its broadest sense, a matter
that cannot be ignored in studying the international system.
There will be a great deal of unhappiness with
the second Obama administration overseas. As much as the world condemns the
United States when it does something, at least part of the world is usually
demanding some action. Obama will disappoint, but it is not Obama. Just as the
elections has paralyze him domestically, reality will limit his foreign
policy. Immobilism is something the founders would have been comfortable with,
both in domestic politics and in foreign policy. The voters have given the
republic a government that will give them both.
Obama's campaign was about no particular
policies. He ran on a platform that famously promised FORWARD!. His
tremendous political achievement was in getting voters to except the concepts in such a way
that they would interpreted it to mean precisely what they wanted them to
mean without committing Obama to specific policies. To the anti-war faction it
meant that the wars would end. To those concerned about unilateralism it meant
that unilateralism would be replaced by multilateralism. To those worried about
growing inequality it meant that he would end inequality. To those concerned
about industrial jobs going overseas it meant that those jobs would stay in the
United States.
In 2008, Obama told the
Democratic convention: “We measure progress by how many people can find a job
that pays the mortgage, whether you can put a little money away at the end of
each month” but
Obama got it dead wrong in suggesting that four more years of his “let
government do it” presidency is the path that will restore the nation’s
economic greatness.
One of the hardest things for a young adult to
master is the principle that, for the most part, there is nothing that can be done.
That is the phase in which the United States finds itself at the moment. It is
coming to terms not so much with the limits of power as the nature of power.
Great power derives from the understanding of the difference between those
things that matter and those that don't, and a ruthless indifference to those
that don't. It is a hard thing to learn, but history is patiently teaching it to the
United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment