Two Nations |
Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton |
Then-Sen. Barack Obama, during the 2008 presidential campaign, said it, too. Blacks and whites, said Obama, “are arrested at very different rates, are convicted at very different rates (and) receive very different sentences … for the same crime.”
When the man who became president of the
United States says this; the No. 1 law enforcement officer, well it must,
therefore, be true, Right?
So let’s examine five major assumptions
behind this assertion.
1) Blacks are arrested at higher rates compared to whites, but wrongly so.
Not true. While only 13 percent of the
population, blacks accounted for 28 percent of nationwide arrests in 2010 and
38.1 percent of arrests for violent crime (murders, forcible rape, robbery and
aggravated assault).
But are they unfairly arrested? Studies find that
arrest rates by race are comparable to the race of suspect identification by
victims.
For example, in a given city, x number of
robbery victims describe their assailants as black, whether or not the suspect
has been apprehended. It turns out that the race of those arrested matches the
percentage given by victims. This has been found repeatedly across the country,
in all categories of crime where the race of an assailant is identified. So
unless the victims are deliberately misidentifying their assailants —
unconcerned about whether the suspect is apprehended and knowingly give a false
race — blacks are not being “over-arrested.”
2) Blacks are convicted at higher rates
and given longer sentences than whites for the same crime.
Not true. Differences in conviction and
sentencing rates by race are due to differences in the gravity of the criminal
offenses, prior records or other legal variables. A 1994 Justice Department
survey of felony cases in the country’s 75 largest urban areas actually found lower felony prosecution rates for blacks than
whites and that blacks were less likely to be found guilty at trial.
3) The sentence disparity between powder
and crack cocaine is racist and accounts for a large percentage of imprisoned
blacks.
Not true. Concerned about the deadly
effect of crack within their own communities, black members of Congress led the
charge to pass the 1986 federal drug laws. The bill that was passed — which
included the crack/powder sentencing disparity — did so with the support of the
majority of black congresspersons.
None at the time objected to the
sentencing disparity as “racist.”
In 2006, the feds tried 5,619 crack
sellers, and 4,495 of them were black — out of the 562,000 blacks in state and
federal prisons at the end of that year. Add in county and city jails, and the
figure rises to 858,000.
And states’ crack cocaine laws are not the culprits. Only 13
states employ differing sentencing guidelines for crack vs. powder — and their
differential is much smaller than that of the feds.
4) The “War on Drugs” accounts for a large number of blacks behind
bars.
War on Drugs |
5) More blacks are in jail than in college.
Not true. “More blacks (are) in jail than college, in every
state,” said Jesse Jackson in 2007. That same year, presidential candidate Sen.
Obama, echoed: “More young black men
languish in prison than attend colleges and universities across America.”
If Jackson and Obama refer to black men of
the usual college-age years, their claim is not even remotely true. According to 2005 Census Bureau
statistics, the male African-American population of the United States aged
between 18 and 24 numbered 1,896,000. According to the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, 106,000 African-Americans in this age group were in federal or
state prisons at the end of 2005. … If you add the numbers in local jail
(measured in mid-2006), you arrive at a grand total of 193,000 incarcerated
young black males, or slightly over 10 percent.
And according to the same census data,
530,000 of these African-American males, or 28 percent, were enrolled in
colleges or universities … in 2005. That is five times the number of young
black men in federal and state prisons and two and a half times the total
number incarcerated. If you expanded the age group to include African-American
males up to 30 or 35, the college attendees would still outnumber the prisoners.”
Brainwashed |
There may be votes in teaching people to
think like victicrats. But the problem of the high rates of black imprisonment
will not be solved by falsely screaming racism.
Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.4
You've been doing your homework!!
ReplyDeleteThe TRUTH is what I seek and it is the TRUTH that I deliver
ReplyDeleteBobby,
DeleteGreat post - Ronald Reagan once said "facts are stubborn things".
In this era of mass communications there is so much information out there; some true, some BS and some mixed. Media outlets don't care about truth and it’s SO refreshing to read statistical information that reinforces the instincts of decent people.
You just broadened my vocabulary; "victicrats" - Ha! The president is a professional "victim".
A subtle fact: strong leaders don't portray themselves as victims, so kudos for delivering on the TRUTH.
Thought you may find this useful:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikemyatt/2012/04/04/10-communication-secrets-of-great-leaders/
Give ‘em Hell and keep up the good work!
The racism is from US CONSTITUTION
ReplyDelete''We the people of....'' that ''WE'' was the white man, excluding the Natives American or the slaves (blacks)
The natives live in apartheid right now, in ''the land of the freaks''
Here is a music video of Obama spilling classified information to make him look good:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/06/15/the-joke-is-on-obama-in-israel/