Is Iran Backing Down On Nuclear Program?

Good News: Iran’s nuclear chief signaled Tehran’s envoys may bring a compromise offer to the talks this week with world powers: Promising to eventually stop producing its most highly enriched uranium, while not totally abandoning its ability to make nuclear fuel.

Bad news: the Obama administration and the West hold a lousy hand as they go into talks with Iran.

The proposal outlined late Sunday seeks to directly address one of the potential main issues in the talks scheduled to begin Friday between Iran and the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany.

In a world of dreams and miracles, the conversations, starting Saturday, would end with the mullahs renouncing their drive toward nuclear weapons, and the disappearance of a thunderhead of foreboding and grief.


The U.S. and others have raised serious concerns about Iran’s production and stockpile of uranium enriched to 20 percent, which could be turned into weapons-grade strength in a matter of months.

 Fereidoun Abbasi

But the proposal described by Iran’s nuclear chief, Fereidoun Abbasi, may not go far enough to satisfy the West because it would leave the higher enriched uranium still in Tehran’s hands rather than transferred outside the country.

Abbasi said Tehran could stop its production of 20 percent enriched uranium needed for a research reactor, and continue enriching uranium to lower levels for power generation.

It demonstrates that the Iranians are emboldened by the West's backing off in Syria. It acknowledges that some of the allies have serious concerns about Barack Obama's willingness to make concessions and stretch out the talks, playing for time, Iranian-style, until after the U.S. presidential election. And it imposes the conclusion that there is no visible way these so-called confidence building exchanges (don't call them negotiations) can produce confidence solid enough for the United States, Britain, France and Germany to believe that Iran is willing to cast aside the nuclear military program they accuse it of running.

What, Me Gone? You're Funny

As little as a month ago, the Obama administration was talking about the imminent departure of Bashar al-Assad, Syria's leader. His ouster would have been a vast blow to Iran, which regards Assad as its closest ally and buffer.

But backed by Russia and China, Tehran has little reason to offer more than a reformulation of its standard maze of denials and ambiguities in response to the West's weak diplomatic cards.

The West buckled in the face of Russian and Chinese resistance, withdrawing its U.N. Security Council draft resolution that demanded that Assad leave and that Russia halt its supply of arms to Syria. No substantive Western action followed. Assad remains. 

The enrichment issue lies at the core of the dispute between Iran and the West, which fears Tehran is seeking an atomic weapon — a charge the country denies, insisting its uranium program is for peaceful purposes only.

Enrichment Process

Uranium has to be enriched to more than 90 percent to be used for a nuclear weapon, but with Iran enriching uranium to 20 percent levels, there are concerns it has come a step closer to nuclear weapons capability.

Abbasi said production of uranium enriched up to 20 percent is not part of the nation’s long-term program — beyond amounts needed for its research reactor in Tehran — and insisted that Iran “doesn’t need” to enrich beyond the 20 percent levels.

“The job is being carried out based on need,” he said. “When the need is met, we will decrease production and it is even possible to completely reverse to only 3.5 percent” enrichment levels.

It was not immediately clear whether Abbasi’s comments reflect what will be Tehran’s official stance when the negotiations begin in Istanbul more than 14 months after the last round collapsed.

At the same time, the Obama administration has left its European counterparts with a virtual certainty: that it wants the talks to extend until Election Day, Nov. 4. This is based on the flimsy premise that Israel will be reluctant to strike Iran as long as the talks continue.

Ali Akbar Salehi 

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi was quoted on the Iranian parliament’s website on Monday as saying he hopes for some progress in the upcoming talks but warned Iran would not accept any preconditions.

“We will honestly try to have the two sides conclude with a win-win situation in which Iran achieves its rights while removing concerns of five-plus-one group,” he said. “But imposing any conditions before the talks would be meaningless.”

Iran insists it has full rights under the NuclearNon-Proliferation treaty to enrich uranium to create nuclear fuel and says it only seeks enrichment levels to power reactors, but the U.S. and others worry that the same process can be used to make weapons-grade material.

Ahead of Istanbul, there are signs Tehran is confident it may have beaten back the toughest Western demands for a complete halt to uranium enrichment and that some bargaining room has now been opened for new proposals.

Who In The Hell Cares?

Yet the Obama administration's approach to the conversations does not include a clear demand for complete shut-down, which intensifies the likelihood of their dawdling futility.

Abbasi’s remarks follow a bravado last week from Iranian lawmaker Gholam Reza Mesbahi Moghadam, who claimed Tehran has the know-how and the capability to produce a nuclear weapon but would never do so.

The French, in this context, are describing themselves as "guardians of the temple," meaning that they have suspicions of U.S. concessions that would bend or skirt the Security Council's requirements for the mullahs to prove their total disengagement from pursuing nukes. (Think, in the worst case, of a triangular deal with Russia and Iran reflecting Mr. Obama's on-mike appeal to Vladimir Putin for "space" in exchange for "flexibility" on missile defense.)

He could well try buying himself more "space" - and get past the election in the process - by trying to bring together American and Israeli timelines on when Iran's drive becomes irreversible. Israel believed that it had nine months in which to act before Iranian targets entered an " immunity zone," while it considered that the United States, with its wider capabilities, had 15.

GBU-31 bunker busters.

There are no guarantees Israel would lengthen its notational time frame to 15 months, but Washington could try by providing it with additional refueling aircraft and 200 GBU-31 bunker busters.

Doing so with time left on the clock for some unmistakable compliance from Tehran would at the same time draw a red line defining for the mullahs what the president meant when he said the U.S. would always "have Israel's back."

After a protracted flap over the venue for the talks, Iranian state TV reported Sunday that both sides had agreed on Istanbul. It said a second round would be held in Baghdad but that its timing would be decided during the meeting in Turkey.

Bashar al-Assad Cannot Survive Much Longer

Rifaat al-Assad

Rifaat al-Assad said that the level of violence on the streets was too high for his nephew to survive.

Mr. Assad has lived in exile since he unsuccessfully tried to seize power from his brother, Hafez, in the 1980s.

In February 1982, he led a military assault on Hama to suppress an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood, leaving between 10,000 and 25,000 people dead.

Jakob Kellenberger

Meanwhile, the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Jakob Kellenberger, is meeting top Syrian officials in Damascus to try to get them to allow aid workers better access to those who have been wounded or displaced by the conflict.








Mr. Kellenberger will also press the Syrian authorities to implement a daily two-hour ceasefire, as stipulated in the peace plan proposed by the UN and Arab League envoy, Kofi Annan.

Kofi Annan

On Monday, Mr. Annan urged the UN Security council to set a deadline of 10 April for the plan to come into force. Syria has agreed to the deadline.

Mr. Annan's spokesman, Ahmed Fawzi, said yesterday that an advance team from the UN's Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) would arrive in Damascus "in the next 48 hours" to discuss the deployment of international monitors.

Although Rifaat al-Assad tried to oust Hafez in a coup while he was recovering from a heart attack and was effectively sent into exile in 1984, he was only formally stripped of his position as vice-president in 1998.

Bashar ai-Assad

When Bashar became president following his father's death in 2000, Rifaat criticized the succession as a "real farce and an unconstitutional piece of theatre". He considered himself the legitimate successor.

BBC Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen says that on one level, it is not surprising that Rifaat - from the vantage point of a gilded exile on one of Paris's smartest avenues - has harsh words for the president.

But the points Rifaat makes are widely accepted among the opponents of the Assad regime both in the West and in the Arab world.

The problems are now general to all parts of Syria - there are no places that have escaped violence - so I don't think Bashar can stay in power much longer" Mr. Assad said in an interview with the BBC. "I would say, though, that he should stay so he can co-operate with a new government and offer the experience he has."

Support For Assad

Rifaat insisted that the Assad family was still "pretty much accepted by the Syrian people.

A commission should go from the Arab League and the [UN] Security Council to monitor free and transparent elections.

Then you will see that the Assad family has got much more importance and support than some of the meaningless figures [of the opposition Syrian National Council] who we see on TV screens now."

What Rifaat meant by that was that he could make a good president - highly unlikely given his years of exile. The SNC has called for Rifaat al-Assad to be subjected to international sanctions like current senior officials in the Syrian government because of his past crimes.

On Monday, Mr. Annan told the UN Security Council that President Assad had agreed to withdraw security forces from major population centers by 10 April.

UN officials and diplomats said the monitors would probably be drawn from other peacekeeping forces in the region and could not be established without an end to the fighting, agreement by all parties and a Security Council mandate.

chairwoman Susan Rice

"We hope that the Syrian authorities will implement fully the commitments that they have made without any conditions," said US permanent representative and Security Council chairwoman Susan Rice. "And should they do so, we will expect the opposition to follow suit within 48 hours."

Mr. Annan's spokesman, Ahmed Fawzi, later said Damascus had committed to begin withdrawing its forces on Sunday and to finish by 10 April, with a general ceasefire within 48 hours contingent on that withdrawal.

Ms Rice also pointed out that the ceasefire was only part of Mr. Annan's peace plan, which also calls for a political process to address the aspirations of the Syrian people, release of detainees, delivery of humanitarian aid, free movement for journalists, and right to protest.

"We have seen promises made and promises broken," she said. "We have seen commitments to end violence followed by massive intensification of violence. The proof is in the actions, not the words."

Free Syrian Army

On Sunday, Gulf Arab states agreed to pay the salaries and other costs of the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA). The money will be distributed through the main opposition coalition, the Syrian National Council (SNC).

The decision was announced at a meeting in Istanbul of the "Friends of Syria" - a group of 83 countries backing political change.

America Under Attack: An Inside Job

Beware America, I bring you news of your own death; a pale shroud laid out by your own hand. Idiotically, you have given religion status to an enemy invader called Islam; thereby egregiously violating the foremost principles of national security, sovereignty and warfare: An enemy invader must never be classified as a religion.

Doing so is equivalent to a mad doctor injecting deadly cancer cells into a healthy patient; in this case America. Look how Muslims are shoving mosques down our throat even at the hallowed "Ground Zero" of 9/11. They thumb their noses and jeer us, adding insult to injury. Why? Islam is "programmed" to bring down America and knows no limits. M.A. Khan in his excellently informative book, Islamic Jihad: A Legacy Of Forced Conversion, Imperialism And Slavery states:

"The perpetuation of a global Islamic rule for eternity is the ultimate goal of Allah"

Dr. Wafa Sultan

Perhaps this is why Dr. Wafa Sultan has named her book A GOD WHO HATES emphasizing Islam's God (Allah) hates all things non-Muslim and utilizes this hatred to fuel the fervor for global Islamic rule mentioned by M.A. Khan above. Needless to say, any ideology with a bigoted, hateful and murderous God should be prohibited religion status in all civilized nations. 

What's next? Don't be surprised if Muslims demand it's their religious right to tear down the White House and replace it with a mega mosque, give them an inch and they will take a mile. In the same way that a blood thirsty tiger cannot survive without devouring its prey. Islam cannot sustain itself without devouring other nations and ideologies. This is a fact; not an opinion; 1400 years of Islamic history prove the case a million times over. Steven Emerson's Investigative Project on Terrorism gives hundreds of up to date examples verifying the dubious nature of Allah's minions. I dare say, that those so called experts who consider Islam to be a religion are not competent in the field of ideology, philosophy, religion, history, sociology or warfare.

Rather than experts, these are "Damned fools" who cannot distinguish between a wooden nickel and a gold coin, and there are legions of them infesting our universities, the media, the state department, the justice department, the military brass, the CIA, the department of defense, the FBI, the NSA, and the Oval Office.

Deplorably, the very persons who are paid to defend us are actually aiding and abetting the overthrow of America by permitting Islam to be categorized as a religion on their watch. There can be no hope for the survival of America long term unless our leaders immediately reverse course by vociferously stating that Islam is not a religion in broad daylight on a world wide scale.

Verifying this epidemic of incompetence and dereliction of duty is the book entitled: Sharia The Threat To America: An Exercise In Competitive Analysis: Report Of Team B II, it states:

Inside Our Perimeter

"The fact the information from Team B II is not even being taught at the basic level to FBI counterterrorism agents and analysts, nor is it taught at the Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, The State or Defense Departments or the CIA . . . We have an enemy inside our perimeter. But for this nation, the challenge is not just the inability to distinguish friend from foe. Rather, it is an unwillingness to do so."

Returning to our medical analogy, this means that "physicians" paid to treat "cancer" are not allowed to study anything about "cancer" or even mention the name. What a laughing stock and painful embarrassment Americas defenders have become in the face of the Islam's ideological blitzkrieg. They might as well just all pack up and go home!

There is no doubt that Islam is an enemy invader. Its Koran shouts it, its prophet shouts it, its Imams shout it, its 1400 years malevolent history shouts it, its key texts shout it, its student organizations "shout it", its lawyers shout it, its refusal to assimilate in governments worldwide shouts it, and its bellicose and bigoted demands for Sharia shout it!

In his insightful article, "What Is Islam" Amil Amani cuts to the crux of the matter by voicing a similar opinion:

"Islam is not a religion, but a harmful thorn; thus, we must make laws to fight this unwanted thorn growing like mushrooms in our backyards . . . Islam is not a religion by any standards. It is a militant, political and savage cult created by one man: Muhammad. It is time that we treat Islam as the greatest threat to the human race. . . Islam is a comprehensive totalitarian form of slavery, it is the opposite of freedom."

 Rebecca Bynum

Our leadership urgently needs to heed the wise consul of Amil Amani. Surely the "experts" can only be considered competent to the extent they agree with him. Amil Amani is not alone in his convictions. Author Rebecca Bynum in her book , Allah Is Dead: Why Islam Is Not a Religion states a similar theme:

"Islam is a recipe for perpetual war... I believe Islam to be the duck-billed platypus of belief systems... If however, Islam continues to be classified as a religion and given the full protection and benefits religions receive in America, then we will be helpless to contain it... That is why Islam cannot remain in the religion category. "

Just An Example

Rebecca Bynum clearly states that Islam as a religion cannot be contained. The evidence is blatantly apparent; Muslims make up only 1 to 2 percent of our population but look at the enormous amount of havoc, disruption, and chaos they reek upon our society.

His usual position with Islam

Under the cover of a religion Islam has been given a free pass to sabotage America from within, and has made enormous progress since 9/11, increasing geometrically, becoming more pugnacious, belligerent and demanding. This means 9/11 has caused America to cower down ideologically and submissively roll out the red carpet to Islam; all this, because we have given an obvious enemy invader the privileged and protected status of a religion. "How stupid can you get?" Author Craig Winn in PROPHET OF DOOM has attempted to wake us up by declaring:

"The Qur'an condemns all non-Muslims-- Christians and Jews and those who worship many gods and no gods. It is an equal opportunity hater... In fact, the Qur'an was written to justify some of the most ungodly behavior the world has ever known... The simple truth is: good Muslims are bad people." 

 Nadal Malik Hassan

Our homegrown America born Jihadist, the "Fort Hood Shooter", Major Nadal Malik Hassan proved he was a good and devout Muslim by murdering 13 and wounding 32 unarmed innocent colleagues inspired by his hateful God Allah.

Now ask yourself, how can any ideology that is referred to as an "equal opportunity hater" and rightly so, ever be given the privileged status of a religion in the civilized world. The truth be told, Islam is the epitome of a barbarian invader, bigoted, totalitarian, pillaging and enslaving. Paraphrasing the wisdom of Winston Churchill, "Islam is the most retrograde of forces."

Once something has been labeled a religion, no American will question, challenge or think objectively about it. Call yourself a religion and Americans turn into zombies letting you do anything you want, even "kill them". The greatest military power in world history lays supine, lily livered, gutless and enfeebled, and it's all because we have wrongly given Islam the protected status of a RELIGION. "Good Bye America it's been nice knowin ya" Surely, this is the bleakest hour in American history when our nation cannot tell friend from foe, nor religion from invader.

There is no doubt that we Americans suffer from a collective mental illness, mental block, emotional imbalance, and psychological disorder, precipitated every time we hear the word religion. Let's call it schizo-religionitis. Mention the word "religion" and we immediately become deaf, dumb and blind, suspending all rational thought and common sense. Here is the childishly insane logic Americans apply to their criteria for a religion:

Apple juice is a liquid and drinking a cup is good for you; therefore drinking a cup of hemlock must be good for you because it is also a liquid.

The absurd conclusion is that drinking a cup of anything liquid is good for you whether it be apple juice or poison. Just hang out a sign with the word religion on it and Americans will instantly "drink up" any poison you feed them.

In other words, it's "one bullet" to the back of our head, with the "kill shot" coming from our own servile leadership. I am harping on this point because the wall of denial is extremely thick, marked by an "epidemic" of shallow mindedness, apathy, flagrant intellectual dishonesty and rampant monetary corruption; the whole quagmire tainted by middle east oil money engulfing our entire military industrial complex, intelligence community, political leadership, media, White House, academic and religious communities. Christopher Logan has written a brilliantly insightful satire called "United States Department of Jihad!" revealing the subversion of our own leadership.

The best thing all Americans can do is tell the truth that Islam is an enemy invader-- not a religion. Doing otherwise is equivalent to "cutting the throat" of America, which our leaders and citizenry do on a daily basis, while "sitting up" for Muslim oil money like puppies doing tricks for doggie biscuits.

In the Art Of War translated by John Minford, Sun Tzu remarks, "He who knows neither self nor enemy will fail in every battle." Today America exhibits a catastrophic failure because it knows neither self nor enemy and stands as helpless as a kitten against the onslaught of Islam's ideological offensive.

One thing is certain, every Imam in the United States is putting on a smiling face and speaking in a sickeningly sweet voice while touting the immaculate splendors of Islam, as they guide their flock to infiltrate and trash this nation" by hook or by crook" as emphatically commanded by the Koran which is irrefutably a manual of war and blood thirsty totalitarian conquest rather than a sacred and holy book. 

Getting Lonely At The Top

A drone operated by the Central Intelligence Agency killed al Qaeda’s second-ranking figure in the mountains of Pakistan earlier this month, American and Pakistani officials said on Saturday, further damaging a terror network that appears significantly weakened since the death of Osama bin Laden in May. 

Atiyah Abd al-Rahman



An American official said that a drone strike on Aug. 22 killed Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, a Libyan who in the last year had taken over as al Qaeda’s top operational planner. Mr. Rahman was in frequent contact with Bin Laden in the months before the terror leader was killed on May 2 by a team of Navy Seals, intelligence officials have said.

American officials described Mr. Rahman’s death as particularly significant as compared with other high-ranking Qaeda operatives who have been killed, because he was one of a new generation of Qaeda leaders that the network hoped would assume greater control after Bin Laden’s death.

Thousands of electronic files recovered at Bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, revealed that Bin Laden communicated frequently with Mr. Rahman. They also showed that Bin Laden relied on Mr. Rahman to get messages to other Qaeda leaders and to ensure that Bin Laden’s recorded communications were broadcast widely.

After Bin Laden was killed, Mr. Rahman became al Qaeda’s No. 2 leader under Ayman al-Zawahiri, who succeeded Bin Laden.

There were few details on Saturday about the strike that killed Mr. Rahman. In the months since Bin Laden’s death, the C.I.A. has maintained a steady barrage of drone missile strikes on mountainous redoubts in Pakistan, a bombing campaign that continues to strain America’s already turbulent relationship with Pakistan.

The C.I.A almost never consults Pakistani officials in advance of a drone strike, and a Pakistani government official said Saturday that the United States had told Pakistan’s government that Mr. Rahman had been the target of the strike only after the spy agency confirmed that he had been killed.

The drone strikes have been the Obama administration’s preferred means of hunting and killing operatives from al Qaeda and its affiliate groups. Over the last year the United States has expanded the drone war to Yemen and Somalia. 

Safe for American troops, Deadly for alQaeda leadership 



Some top American officials have said publicly that they believe al Qaeda is in its final death throes, though many intelligence analysts are less certain, saying that the network built by Bin Laden has repeatedly shown an ability to regenerate.

Yet even as al Qaeda affiliates in places like Yemen and North Africa continue to plot attacks against the West, most intelligence analysts believe that the remnants of al Qaeda’s leadership in Pakistan has been weakened considerably. Mr. Rahman’s death is another significant blow to the group.

Hezbollah members confess to spying for CIA: Nasrallah



Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah



Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah said today that members of his group had confessed to being CIA agents, and accused arch-foe Israel of turning to the US spy agency after failing to infiltrate his party.

The US embassy in Beirut immediately dismissed the accusations as "empty," saying Nasrallah seemed to be "addressing internal problems within Hezbollah."

In the first such acknowledgement of infiltration since the Iranian-backed Shiite group's founding in the 1980s, Nasrallah refused to give the identities of two party members he said were working for the Central Intelligence Agency.

But he said a third case was also under investigation, and slammed the American embassy in Beirut as a "den of spies."

"When the Israeli enemy failed to infiltrate Hezbollah, it turned to the most powerful intelligence agency," he said in a closed-circuit television speech, referring to the CIA.

"Our investigation has found that... (CIA) intelligence officers have recruited two of our members separately, whom we shall not name out of respect for the privacy of their families.

"The first confessed he was recruited five months ago... while the second confessed he had been recruited even before that," he said, adding that the recruiters were CIA agents posing as diplomats at the US embassy east of Beirut.

Nasrallah also said the group was investigating whether the third member of the militant group had been recruited by the CIA, Israel's Mossad or the intelligence service of a European country.

A US embassy spokesperson told AFP there was no substance to Nasrallah's accusations, pointing instead to internal problems within Hezbollah.

"These are the same kinds of empty accusations that we have repeatedly heard from Hezbollah," the US spokesperson said shortly after Nasrallah's speech.

"There is no substance to his accusation," he added. "It appears as if Nasrallah was addressing internal problems within Hezbollah with which we have nothing to do.

"Our position towards Hezbollah is well known and has not changed."

The United States blacklists Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation, Until Obama.

Palestinian's Poised To Strike Israel

President Obama recently showed his naivety in discussing the Palestinian problem when he made an issue of ’67 borders with minor alterations a major condition that Israel must cede for the imminent creation of a newly formed Palestinian state. The very issue of borders at this time is a smokescreen, a red herring, to avoid facing the real significant issue of the nature of what this state truly represents.

Borders, at this time, are not the issue. The real issue is the nature of a regime that may be about to be inflicted onto the world. The nature of this regime makes borders irrelevant. The issue must be concentrated as to whether this new state should be born at all in the shape it presents itself today. 

Palestinian SS Army Soldiers


The so-called “moderate” and “pragmatic” Palestinian Authority have introduced a law which says that any Arab that sells land to a Jews will be executed. This is a law straight out of the Nazi Nuremberg laws.  Furthermore, the so-called “moderate” and “pragmatic” Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, has said, on more than one occasion, that any Palestinian state must be clear of Jews, in other words “Judenrein”. This is straight out of “Mein*Kamf”.

If any further evidence is needed as to the true nature of this new regime that the world is hurriedly trying to foist onto us hear the words of Yunis Al-Astal. In his excitement of an impending new Palestinian state he said the following. Bear in mind that he is a member of the Palestinian Legislature and a cleric. On A-Aqsa TV on May 11, 2011 he said this;

"The Jews are brought in droves to Palestine so that the Palestinian, and the Islamic nation behind them, will have the honor of annihilating the evil of this gang.  All the predators, all the birds of prey, all the dangerous reptiles and insects, and all the lethal bacteria are far less dangerous than the Jews.

In just a few years, all the Zionists and the settlers will realize that their arrival in Palestine was for the purpose of the great massacre by means of which Allah wants to relieve humanity of their evil.

When Palestine is liberated and its people return to it and the entire region, with the grace of Allah, will have turned into the United States of Islam, the land of Palestine will become the capital of the Islamic Caliphate, and all these countries will turn into states within the Caliphate. When this happens any Palestinian will be able to live anywhere because the land of Islam is the property of all Muslims.

Until this happens, we must reject all the resettlement plans, naturalization, or even reparations prior to the return of the refugees.”

If you think this is an aberration of Palestinian intent, think again. The Hamas Charter contains the following gems;

“Israel will exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it has obliterated others before it.

The day the enemies usurp part of Muslim land Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Muslim. In the face of the Jews usurpation, it is compulsory for the banner of Jihad to be raised.

The Day of Judgment will not come until Muslims fight Jews and kill them. Then the Jews will hide behind rocks and trees, and the rocks and trees will cry out, ‘Oh Muslim! There is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him!’”

The Hamas regards itself as the spearhead and vanguard of the struggle against world Zionism.”

If you thought that it was only the extreme Hamas that harbored evil intentions towards Israel, and that the Palestinian Authority was more reasonable to accommodate Israel, consider these references in their Palestinian National Covenant;

The basic conflict exists between the forces of Zionism and the Palestinian Arab people. Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.  One national front for the liberation of Palestine through armed struggle.  The liberation of Palestine is a national duty to repel the Zionist aggression against the Arab homeland and aims at the elimination of Zionism in Palestine.”

If anyone is in doubt that the Palestinians do not accept a two states for two people solution continue reading the PNC Charter;

“The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the establishment of the State of Israel are entirely illegal.

The Balfour Declaration and the Mandate of Palestine are deemed null and void.

Israel is the instrument of the Zionist movement. Since the liberation of Palestine will destroy the Zionist presence and will contribute to the establishment of peace in the Middle East, the Palestinians look to the support of all progressive and peaceful forces in the just struggle for the liberation of their homeland.  It requires all states to consider Zionism an illegitimate movement, to outlaw its existence, and to ban its operations.”

But let us not concentrate on the leadership alone. The effect of their racial, inflammatory, anti-Semitism can be seen in the actions and heard in the voices of the Palestinian people. Voices like Sara Awwadh Jaber of Hebron. Interviewed on Al Aqsa Palestinian TV she said this;

 This, then, is the face of a “moderate” Palestine.

There you have it in all its clarity. The Palestinian intent is not the establishment of a state alongside Israel, but the eventual replacement of Israel by force. All the “progressives” and outside “peaceful forces” have been recruited solely and purposefully for the destruction of Israel and the elimination of Zionism in the land of Israel.  This perfectly describes the actions and intentions of the so-called “human rights” groups, the boycotters, and the Free Gaza mob. They are all fully aware that they seek the destruction of Israel.

If any state should be the target of delegitimisation surely this racist, anti-Semitic, Nazi-like regime, to be called Palestine, is it.

Can you not read and feel the evil that will be inflicted onto the world should such a state be granted validity?  Certainly all the Islamic nations will line up to give this entity their blessings. For sure, the Marxists will be cheering wildly. But surely the Western and free nations will pause before bringing this monster into being? Or will they?

Let them be warned. Let them read the words of an eager Palestinian leadership and a bloodthirsty Palestinian people with evil intent to understand the tragic results of a wrong decision.  Do they really want to release this evil onto the world? 

Remember this. It always starts with the Jews. It never ends with them.